Nobody alive is absent or neutral. Yet, many professionals, though often for well-intending reasons, pursue an imaginary absence or neutrality of their person or ego. It goes for the psychotherapist, the questionnaire sociologist, the test psychologist, the fieldwork anthropologist which is my profession, economists more in tune with each other than with outside reality, physicists ignoring quantum duality¸ the medical doctor, the spiritual healer, the guru and the priest as well as it goes for the teacher, the police, the judge, the journalist and the official media. While having in mind scientific rules, the law, contracts, training, the Spirit, the God, the government, professional ethics or maintaining law and order, they try to be a proper scientist, a warm-hearted inspiration, a pure transmitter, a critical reporter or just ruler.
But
since the 1960s it is increasingly acknowledged that professional objectives of
being absent or neutral are impossible to realize. Even quite some gurus,
pretending to be enlightened, are exposed as not having realized such
enlightenment. It is therefore more realistic for all these professionals to,
scaring as it may seem to be, openly acknowledge and discuss the personal
signals we emit and the biases that guide our behaviors. It makes our work more
complex but, contrary to earlier beliefs, also more trustworthy and effective
when we leave ivory towers and holy mountains, and come back home where the
people live.
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten