Even if we stop economic growth,
which is unlikely, there will be a continuation of global warming, depletion of
ocean fish, depletion of groundwater stock, depletion of forests and problems
related to meat production. Some of these processes are beyond the point-of-no-return
or will soon reach that point.
zondag 28 juni 2015
MODIFY OR PERISH
maandag 15 juni 2015
FEMALE FIGURINES DO NOT PROVE MATRIARCHY
While we can support the feminist movement,
the argument that female figurines prove the existence of matriarchy may not be
seen as holding ground.
Certainly, tribal societies, onwards
from about 25,000 years ago, made small, voluptuous female figurines. These
figurines are thought to represent motherhood, nature, fertility, creation,
destruction or the bounty of the earth.
Some believe the female figurines
represented goddesses and as such prove the existence of matriarchal or female-dominated
societies. The lithuanian archeologist Marija Gimbutas (1921-1994) did
pioneering work on this thesis. She identified a large number of female
figurines, mostly in Europe.
But how do we interpret their
existence? Were these figurines really meant to represent goddesses? Perhaps
they were made by men who in a very earthly way adored or longed for the female
body. Perhaps females themselves adored the figurines and were the ones who
made them. Therefore, there is no proof that the female figurines represent
goddesses.
Neither can we say that these
female figurines prove the existence of matriarchal societies. On the other
hand, there is ample evidence that in tribal societies women and men tended to
just have a simple division of labor, with women mostly collecting plant food
and men mostly collecting animal food, which remains unrelated to domination by
either sex.
Furthermore, agrarian societies,
from over the last 10,000 years, also made female figurines although these
societies are clearly patriarchal or male dominated. Male dominance arose with
agriculture with men leaving the domain of hunting and pushing women out of
control in the domain of plant food, although women kept working a lot in
agriculture. But such patriarchal societies did not rule out the existence of female
figurines, representing goddesses or not.
http://www.reclaimingquarterly.org/web/gimbutas/gimbutas1.html
Courtesy:
Tom Parsons, Louk Vreeswijk and Sandra Hamilton
Tribal figurine Venus of Willendorf, about 25,000 years old
Figurine 'Bird Lady' in patriarchal Egypt, about 5,500 years old
maandag 8 juni 2015
HOW FARMING MADE MEN AFRAID OF FEMALE SEXUALITY
Why do many men fear the sexual power of women? The Indian psychologist
Sudhir Kakar provides an explanation in his book
The Inner World.
His theory has eight steps, cyclically connected:
1. When farming got developed, men took over the
domain of plant food. This made the male group of the family (agnates) keep their
land together and arrange inheritance rules accordingly.
2. When a son marries he is more or
less kept away from his in-married wife because she is seen as a threat for the
solidarity in the agnate group.
3.Therefore, the wife has a unsatisfactory relationship with her husband
and his family.
4. When she bears a son, she gets more respect from his family, so a son
is very important for her.
5. Subconsciously, she projects not
only her love but also her unmet sexual desire on the son.
6. The son enjoys her love as a
paradise, but her adult sexuality he feels as way too much and even as
dangerous, poisonous.
7. In his adulthood the son expects
the same unconditional love from women, but also deeply fears their female
sexuality.
8. When he marries he will keep her
sexuality away from him as it still feels as dangerous, which is functional for
the agnate group solidarity.
Some versions of the Indian goddess Kali represent the deep ambivalence
of men about women.
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/232036.The_Inner_World
-----
Many societies have a more or similar type of kinship pattern. In catholic
Mediterranean cultures the deep ambivalence of men about women is
symbolized by the ‘Madonna-whore’ complex.
All along millions of years men have been going out and leaving their women
behind, with perhaps the fear of female sexuality as a push factor contributing
to the men’s adventurous travels, as hunters, explorers, conquerors, cowboys,
sailors or warriors, and in modern society as commuters to their work.
See also: http://www.alternet.org/sex-amp-relationships/unveiling-madonna-whore-complex
vrijdag 5 juni 2015
ANIMALS HAVE NO TRAUMA
Animals don’t
suffer from trauma. In all mammals under threat, massive amounts of energy are
mobilized in readiness for self-defense via the fight, flight, and freeze
responses, but once safe, animals spontaneously "discharge" this
excess energy through involuntary movements including shaking, trembling, and
deep spontaneous breaths.
But humans may
disrupt this process of discharging through rationalizations, judgments, shame,
enculturation, and fear of our bodily sensations. As a consequence, sleep,
cardiac, digestion, respiration, and the immune system can be seriously
disturbed, and an array of other physical, cognitive, emotional, and behavioral
symptoms may occur.
The Somatic
Experience approach facilitates the completion of self-protective motor
responses and the release of thwarted survival energy bound in the body, thus
addressing the root cause of trauma symptoms. Clients are gently guided to
develop increasing tolerance for difficult bodily sensations and suppressed
emotions.
The traumatized
person is offered the opportunity to engage, complete and resolve in slow and
supported ways the body's instinctual fight, flight, freeze, and collapse
responses. Individuals locked in anxiety or rage then relax into a growing
sense of peace and safety. Those stuck in depression gradually find their
feelings of hopelessness and numbness transformed into empowerment, triumph,
and mastery.
After: www.traumahealing.com/somatic-experiencing/
Abonneren op:
Posts (Atom)