CONTENT
AND DYNAMIC OF CULTURE
How
can I so coldly deny that religion and spirituality influence culture, although
I have spiritual orientations myself?
That
is because, as both a social scientist and a policy advisor, I give priority to
looking at generally occurring dynamics or mechanisms in how humans interact,
irrespective of the content they produce.
One
such general dynamic creates what many call culture. But often we only look at
the content of a specific culture or compare the content of different cultures.
We then either ignore the dynamic that produces such cultures or mix content
and social dynamic.
As a
policy advisor, I acknowledge the attention that we pay to culture can be
generated by our concern about a specific culture or a need we feel to change
that culture.
Now,
in order to achieve anything here, it is important to clearly understand the
working of the social dynamic in itself, irrespective cultural content.
This
cultural dynamic, as I have come to see it, consists of learning,
internalizing, expressing and transferring commonalities in behaviors, that is,
in feeling, thinking and acting, in a social entity such as a society or
organization.
Like it
is important to understand how the dynamic of the internal combustion engine makes
cars run, for policy reasons it is helpful to clearly see the social dynamic that
creates culture.
If we
would want to change, say, certain behaviors, we will hopelessly fail if we focus
on the surface and only see cultural content. We will be fight symptoms. We
need to study how the learning, internalizing, expressing and transferring takes
place and find ways to modify those processes.
In other words, religion cannot exist without the social dynamic of learning, internalizing, expressing and transferring of common behaviors. But this social dynamic can very well exist without religion.
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten