dinsdag 15 juli 2014

RICH AND POOR IN THE FUTURE

It is not new that humanity has a gap between rich and poor and that economic growth may benefit both rich and poor but does not narrow the gap between rich and poor. Also not new is that since Karl Marx, Friedrich Engels and Antonio Gramsci, many authors have exposed economic inequality and called for protest. Notably after the Second World War a long train of other critical writers stood up: Mao Zedong, André Gunder Frank, Harry Magdoff, Ernest Feder, Teresa Hayter, Noam Chomsky, Arundhati Roy, Norena Hertz, Naomi Klein, Kishore Mahbubani, Thomas Piketti, Rana Dasgupta and Hervé Kempf, to mention just a few. Also not new is that their exposures and calls for action have in the long run not changed society.

INCORPORATED

New is that most of these authors are no longer seen as dangerous outcastes who have to be silenced or at least ignored. They are co-opted or incorporated by the dominant system and seen as part of the intellectual class. Many are regularly discussed in universities and in the media.

EQUALLY ROGUE

In the Non-West economic growth shows itself in a rogue character that has no parallel. In Jakarta, Shanghai, Rio de Janeiro, Mumbai, Lagos, Sao Paulo, Moscow, Delhi, Johannesburg, Beijing, Caracas, Bandung or Cairo there arises a generation of arrogant, aggressive, ultra-materialistic new wealthy people that unleash a savage type of capitalism. They benefit from both cheap labor at home and liberalization and privatization policies initiated by the World Bank and the IMF.

Meanwhile, this rogue capitalism is not only seen as an unavoidable stage in economic development as happened in the West, but is increasingly expected to not calm down, as in the West, and remain as it is. Along with this reality, the West, after a relatively 'calm' period, now breeds an equally savage type of capitalism. In this state, western capitalism gets closely related to its savage partners elsewhere while now operates on a more equal footing.

GROWING CARE

Along with the rise of global economic roguishness, protests are changing in character. They seem to transform from street marches, riots and outright physical violence, under the banner of class struggle and led by trade unionists, politicians, generals and guerilla fighters, to the undermining of the credibility of political systems and private corporations by growing information, including the use of social media. The awareness results in boycotts of political elections and questionable consumer goods.

Next to that, initiatives arise which focus on psychological and spiritual change at the personal level. Inner peace is hoped to divert attention to the rat race of the economic growth model and a growing care for the inner self, other people and the physical environment.

SCARCITY

So far, proclaiming that continued economic growth will ultimately destroy the planet and human life has neither stopped large masses of people from aiming at more consumption, nor stopped the ultra-rich from their roguish practices. The first key question is how long and in what ways economic growth will remain to be jointly embraced by the masses and the ultra-rich. The second key question is at what point in time a looming environmental disaster will make the roguish rich start reserving sparse resources for themselves. The third key question is whether the masses will let the gap between rich and poor grow further or finally start open fights with the roguish rich and narrow the gap.

NO MONEY FOR DEVELOPMENT

Why do I, after 40 years of experience with development work, not give money for such activities.

Small, personal initiatives by a western women or men aimed at distributing money or materials can benefit some poor people but create feelings of relative deprivation in others. Also, such distribution projects do not change the social structure and personal motivation that create or contribute to poverty. What is more, many of such projects divert energy and talent away from development.

Larger private projects invite for corruption once the donor and receiving organizers get established interests and tend to share more and more money and other benefits jobs among themselves. Large government-to-government programs show the same types of corruption. Also here, projects aiming at distribution of benefits divert energy and talent away from development.

To my mind, the best help that can be offered by westerners is to first of all get thoroughly familiar with the local society and the misery that may exist and learn to not escape from acknowledging or digesting such realities by emotionally motivated interventions. That means, first develop yourself.

Second, mature and wise people, perhaps more to be found among elderly than among youngsters, may stay for longer periods with local populations and support them in their search for feasible opportunities within the given reality by getting your feet on the ground.

There are good examples of experienced, retired couples ready to live for some years among poor people. Hardly any money is needed for such activities.

Now, imagine the situation wherein clean water is not available because upstream a chemical factory discharges industrial poisons or a large plantation applies agricultural chemicals with the result that, downstream, the river and the groundwater get polluted. Then the local victims face powerful companies, along with civil servants and politicians that are bribed or intimidated by such companies.


What the victims’ community may help is the long-term presence of reliable and experienced people who can support the community in their struggle against the polluting companies and responsible authorities. For such struggles not finances but skilful and persistent communicators are needed who contribute to the capacity building of the local population so that these local people can defend their interests better in the future.